Bolg | myelearning.uk for success

Alan Ford Alan Ford

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

2025 Useful 8020–100% Free Test Simulator Fee | Latest ORM Certificate - 2023 Update Exam Forum

Maybe you are unfamiliar with our 8020 latest material, but our 8020 real questions are applicable to this exam with high passing rate up to 98 percent and over. Choosing from a wide assortment of practice materials, rather than aiming solely to make a profit from our 8020 latest material, we are determined to offer help. Quick purchase process, free demos and various versions and high quality 8020 Real Questions are al features of our advantageous practice materials. With passing rate up to 98 to 100 percent, you will get through the 8020 practice exam with ease. So they can help you save time and cut down additional time to focus on the 8020 practice exam review only.

PRMIA 8020 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Case Studies: This section of the exam measures the skills of Business Risk Consultants and covers real-world applications of risk management concepts. It examines case studies on risk governance, assessment, and mitigation strategies across different industries. A key skill measured is analyzing historical risk events for strategic insights.

Topic 2

Introduction: This section of the exam measures the skills of Risk Analysts and covers fundamental concepts of risk governance, management, and assessment. It introduces key principles, regulatory frameworks, and industry best practices for identifying and addressing risks. A key skill measured is understanding the foundational principles of risk management.

Topic 3

Insurance Mitigation: This section of the exam measures the skills of Insurance Risk Managers and covers strategies for transferring risk through insurance and other financial instruments. It focuses on risk transfer mechanisms, policy structuring, and claims management. A key skill measured is assessing risk transfer options through insurance.

Topic 4

Risk Assessment: This section of the exam measures the skills of Financial Risk Analysts and covers methodologies for evaluating risks in different domains, including qualitative and quantitative approaches. It focuses on assessing vulnerabilities, threats, and potential impacts on business operations. A key skill measured is conducting risk impact analysis for financial threats.

Topic 5

Risk Management Framework: This section of the exam measures the skills of Risk Managers and covers the development and implementation of structured approaches for risk identification, evaluation, and mitigation. It includes industry-standard frameworks that guide risk strategy and decision-making. A key skill measured is establishing a risk management framework for organizations.

>> Test 8020 Simulator Fee <<

Free PDF Quiz 2025 PRMIA 8020: Professional Test ORM Certificate - 2023 Update Simulator Fee

In the complicated and changeable information age, have you ever been tried hard to find the right training materials of 8020 exam certification? We feel delighted for you to find PassExamDumps, and more delighted to find the reliable 8020 Exam Certification training materials. It will help you get your coveted 8020 exam certification.

PRMIA ORM Certificate - 2023 Update Sample Questions (Q38-Q43):

NEW QUESTION # 38
In operational resilience, what is impact tolerance?

A. Impact tolerance is a firm's risk capacity statement.
B. Impact tolerance is a firm's risk appetite statement.
C. Impact tolerance is a firm's tolerance for disruption to a particular business process.
D. Impact tolerance is a firm's tolerance for disruption to a particular business service.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Impact Tolerance is a key concept in Operational Resilience, defined as the ability of a firm to withstand, respond to, and recover from disruptions. According to PRMIA and global regulatory frameworks (such as the Bank of England's Operational Resilience Framework), impact tolerance is specifically tied to business services rather than processes.
Step 1: Defining Impact Tolerance
Impact tolerance is the maximum acceptable level of disruption to an important business service, beyond which there would be intolerable harm to customers, financial markets, or regulatory obligations.
It is not the same as risk appetite or risk capacity, as those deal with broader organizational risk exposure.
Step 2: Why Business Services Matter
PRMIA defines business services as end-to-end services delivered to clients and stakeholders, such as payments processing, trade execution, or loan approvals.
Disruptions to these services directly impact customers and financial stability, making business service resilience the core focus of impact tolerance.
Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
Option A ("tolerance for disruption to a particular business process")
Incorrect because impact tolerance applies to services, not just internal processes.
Option C ("a firm's risk appetite statement")
Incorrect because risk appetite focuses on how much risk a firm is willing to take, while impact tolerance is about surviving disruptions.
Option D ("a firm's risk capacity statement")
Incorrect because risk capacity is the maximum level of risk a firm can bear, which is broader than business service disruptions.
PRMIA Risk Reference Used:
PRMIA Operational Resilience Guidelines - Defines impact tolerance as a service-based metric.
Bank of England's Operational Resilience Framework - Establishes impact tolerance as a limit on business service disruption.
Final Conclusion:
Impact tolerance focuses on business services, not just internal processes or risk appetite, making Option B the correct answer.

NEW QUESTION # 39
For the TSB case what was the cause of the outage at the heart of the case?

A. Their IT models did not work if prices were discontinuous.
B. A liquidity squeeze by a major hedge-fund via margin calls on trading positions resulted in the collapse of their website.
C. Sub-standard risk pricing and risk management left millions of people locked out of their accounts for weeks.
D. A failed attempts to move customers to a new IT system left millions of people locked out of their accounts for weeks.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Step 1: Understanding the TSB Case
The TSB outage in 2018 was caused by a failed IT migration from its old banking system to a new one.
The transition locked millions of customers out of their accounts for weeks, resulting in financial losses and reputational damage.
Step 2: Why Option C Is Correct
TSB attempted to move customer data to a new banking platform, but serious defects in the migration process led to service failures.
PRMIA and UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reports confirmed that poor IT risk management was a key failure.
Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
Option A ("Liquidity squeeze by hedge-fund")
Incorrect because TSB's failure was due to IT migration issues, not a liquidity crisis.
Option B ("Sub-standard risk pricing and risk management")
Incorrect because pricing models were not the cause-it was an IT system failure.
Option D ("IT models did not work if prices were discontinuous")
Incorrect as this issue is more common in high-frequency trading failures, not banking system outages.
PRMIA Risk Reference Used:
UK FCA Investigation on TSB Incident - Confirms IT migration failure as root cause.
PRMIA IT Risk Management Framework - Highlights risks of major IT transitions.
Final Conclusion:
The TSB outage was caused by a failed IT migration, making Option C the correct answer.

NEW QUESTION # 40
In order for a KRI to be effective it must be:

A. Qualitative, Consistent Efficient & Repeatable.
B. Quantitative, Repeatable and Efficient.
C. Quantitative and Qualitative. Consistent. Efficient & Repeatable.
D. Quantitative, Consistent and Comparable. Efficient & Repeatable

Answer: C

Explanation:
Definition of an Effective Key Risk Indicator (KRI)
A KRI is a metric used to identify, measure, and monitor emerging risks.
To be effective, KRIs must be both quantitative and qualitative, allowing for a comprehensive risk view.
Key Characteristics of Effective KRIs
Quantitative - Uses numerical data for trend analysis.
Qualitative - Incorporates expert judgment and scenario-based insights.
Consistent - Maintains uniform definitions across reporting periods.
Efficient & Repeatable - Must be easily measured and consistently reported.
Why Other Answers Are Incorrect
Option
Explanation:
B . Qualitative, Consistent, Efficient & Repeatable.
Incorrect - Excludes quantitative aspects, which are essential for KRIs.
C . Quantitative, Consistent, Comparable, Efficient & Repeatable.
Incorrect - While comparison is useful, qualitative factors are missing, making this answer incomplete.
D . Quantitative, Repeatable and Efficient.
Incorrect - Lacks qualitative insights and consistency as key factors for KRIs.
PRMIA Reference for Verification
PRMIA Risk Indicator Guidelines
Basel Committee's Principles on Risk Data and KRI

NEW QUESTION # 41
For the National Australia Bank - FX Options case study, which was the major cause of the loss event?

A. Currency traders were allowed access to the risk system by the CEO.
B. Currency traders smoothed profits and concealed losses.
C. Currency traders concealed losses using back office knowledge.
D. Currency traders were able to complete a Management Buy Out (MBO).

Answer: B

Explanation:
Overview of the National Australia Bank (NAB) FX Options Case Study
Traders at National Australia Bank (NAB) engaged in unauthorized foreign exchange (FX) options trading.
They smoothed profits and concealed losses using fictitious transactions and manipulated reporting.
This led to a major financial scandal and loss of investor confidence.
Key Findings of the Investigation
Traders artificially smoothed profits to avoid drawing attention to large fluctuations.
Losses were concealed from internal risk controls by manipulating trade records.
The bank's risk management and governance controls failed to detect and prevent these activities.
Why Other Answers Are Incorrect
Option
Explanation:
A . Currency traders were allowed access to the risk system by the CEO.
Incorrect - No evidence suggests CEO involvement in granting system access.
B . Currency traders concealed losses using back-office knowledge.
Incorrect - While they concealed losses, they also smoothed profits to manipulate earnings trends.
D . Currency traders were able to complete a Management Buy Out (MBO).
Incorrect - This event was not related to a Management Buyout (MBO); it was a trading scandal.
PRMIA Reference for Verification
PRMIA Fraud and Risk Management Case Studies
Basel Principles on Market Risk and Internal Control Failures

NEW QUESTION # 42
Risk Capacity for a bank is defined as the:

A. Amount of risk the bank wishes to take.
B. Amount of risk the regulator sets for the bank.
C. Ability to suffer an extreme event with an orderly wind up with only shareholders losing money.
D. Ability to withstand an extreme event and make a profit.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Step 1: Definition of Risk Capacity
Risk Capacity refers to the maximum level of risk a bank can absorb while still maintaining orderly operations or, in extreme cases, conducting an orderly resolution.
PRMIA and Basel III define risk capacity as a bank's ability to absorb losses in a crisis without systemic consequences.
Step 2: Why Option D Is Correct
The ultimate test of a bank's risk capacity is whether it can survive an extreme shock without harming depositors or financial markets.
Regulators ensure that a bank can be wound up in an orderly manner so that only shareholders lose money, while depositors and creditors remain protected under resolution planning frameworks.
Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
Option A ("Amount of risk the bank wishes to take")
Incorrect because this describes Risk Appetite, not Risk Capacity.
Option B ("Amount of risk the regulator sets for the bank")
Incorrect because regulators set capital requirements, but the bank's actual risk capacity is based on its own capital structure and business model.
Option C ("Ability to withstand an extreme event and make a profit")
Incorrect because risk capacity is about survival, not profit-making during extreme events.
PRMIA Risk Reference Used:
Basel III Risk Capacity Standards - Defines the ability to absorb losses during crises.
PRMIA Risk Governance Framework - Describes how banks should manage risk capacity through capital buffers.
Final Conclusion:
Banks must be able to withstand an extreme event and conduct an orderly wind-up if necessary, ensuring that only shareholders bear the loss, making Option D the correct answer.

NEW QUESTION # 43
......

If moving up in the fast-paced technological world is your objective, PRMIA is here to help. The excellent ORM Certificate - 2023 Update (8020) practice exam from PRMIA can help you realize your goal of passing the PRMIA Treasury with ORM Certificate - 2023 Update (8020) certification exam on your very first attempt. Most people find it difficult to find excellent PRMIA Treasury with ORM Certificate - 2023 Update (8020) exam dumps that can help them prepare for the actual ORM Certificate - 2023 Update (8020) exam.

Latest 8020 Exam Forum: https://www.passexamdumps.com/8020-valid-exam-dumps.html